Interesting Computer Info & Offers. Daily Updates!!

By 

Senor Zoidbergo (Washington D.C.) –

  

  

When I first reviewed the Asus 1201N in January 2010 (see my Amazon review for that netbook), I stated that it was the best netbook on the market. A lot of time (in the consumer electronics world) has passed since that review, and Asus has released the upgrade to the 1201N, in the form of the 1215N. Does the 1215N take the crown from the 1201N, and is the 1215N the best netbook available today (September 2010) on the market?

In a word, YES! The major gripe about the 1201N was of course the limited battery life, approximately 3.5 hours on average. Even though I primarily used my 1201N near an electrical outlet, there were times when I had to go portable with it, and the short battery life was painfully insufficient. Asus has upgraded both the processor and the graphics technology for the 1215N. The processor is the desktop grade Intel D525 1.8 GHz dual-core processor, a step-up from the dual core Atom 330s powering the initial 1201N. While I would’ve liked to see Intel’s new N550 dual core Atom processors on the 1215N instead, the D525s are more than sufficient. I suspect that Asus will release their next version of the 12XXN series with some sort of new lower power dual core processor and graphics technology.

Note, the N550 processors are a new generation of 1.5 GHz low power dual core processors, and suffice it to say, the days of single core N450 type processors are quickly disappearing. Asus has announced a 1215P netbook, which is equipped with the N550 but NO Nvidia ION2 technology, and relies solely on Intel’s GMA3150 integrated graphics solution, which is increasingly antiquated when used as a standalone. The 1215P is intended as an upgraded to the previously poorly received 1201PN, and while it will have an improved battery life, it will have difficulty handling games and high definition 1080P media.

CPU wise, the general variety of the dual core powered netbooks on the market presently are as follows; D525, N550, AMD Athlon II Neo K325.

Base on clockspeed only, the general order of CPU ranking is as follows;

D525 > N550 > K325

The Athlon IIs are powerful adversaries, but according to other online reviews, suffer from poor battery life, on par with that of the original 1201N, ~ 3.5 hours. Such Athlon II Neo equipped platforms include the 11.6″ Dell Inspiron M101z (K325) and the Acer Aspire One (K125). But a Dell M101z with Neo K325, 4GB of RAM, and 320 GB HDD will cost you $579; $100 more than the 1215N, and with its poor battery performance, is really just a faster 1201N.

The N550s are found on platforms such as the HP Mini 5103 and are good low power competitors to the D525s, but are crippled because they appear to be bundled with the Intel GMA 3150s. A comparably optioned Mini 5103 and Crystal Broadcom HD Chip will likely run into the $500-$600 range. And the Mini 5103 only has a 10.1″ screen.

Where does that leave the D525 then? While the desktop/nettop chip is quite powerful, Intel has intentionally embedded some features which limit the maximum potential of the 1215N. The D525′s embedded memory controller limits usable RAM to 2.8 GB, meaning that it is probably NOT advisable to purchase the 4 GB version of the 1215N. The RAM runs in single channel mode only, and the D525 is limited to 32-bit addressing, which may render installation of 64-bit Windows 7 moot. However, don’t let these nitpicks drag you down; they are limitations you might want to consider if you’re extremely critical about your netbook, but for the average user like myself, they don’t bother me, since I’m not interested in using the 1215N as a 64 bit powerhouse.

Asus has paired the D525s with the Nvidia Ion 2 graphics solution, which gives the 1215N comparable battery performance to the lower power N550 matched with integrated solutions, an incredible feat. The Ion 2 used in the 1215N comprises the G210 GPU with integrated GMA3150, and when combined with Nvidia’s Optimus switching technology, allows use of the G210 for intensive gaming sessions, while using the low power GMA 3150 for more mundane tasks. The result is a battery life nearly double that of the 1201N. The Ion2 uses all 16 cores of the GT2XX chip and is clocked at 475 MHz. The original Nvidia Ion is comparable to a 9400M, and the Ion 2 is roughly 60% faster than the Ion. However, there is a potential bottleneck, again due to intentional limitations from Intel. The Ion 2′s potential is hindered by Intel refusing to share its DMI interface with Nvidia, forcing the Ion 2 to operate on the PCI-e 1x lane, where it cannot operate at full bandwidth. Again, like the caveats with the D525s, this is a limitation you might want to consider if you’re extremely critical about your netbook, but for the average user like myself, they don’t bother me and the effects aren’t noticeable…

Read more

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

|

 Comments (41)

By 

R. Crossley “IT Professional” (PA, USA) –

  

I can tell you that much of my day is spent fixing someone else’s computer or computer problems. So when it comes time to make a computer purchase for myself, I spend countless hours going over the specs, prices, and value of different netbooks and ultraportable laptops. I read every comment (especially the negative ones) and poured over reviews and sites providing detailed information. I enjoy playing games, but I know the limitations of this souped-up netbook. My goal was to buy the best netbook that gave me the most bang for the buck. So that means I’m not going to just waste my money and overspend on some Alienware M11x gaming laptop. I did not want to spend much money so after deciding this was the netbook for me, I waited for it to go on sale during Black Friday for $423.54 and was able to pick up the silver version which is better than the black version due to how easy it is to get finger prints and smudges on the black netbook. Also, if it did not go on sale, you wouldn’t be reading this review right now. There are a lot of cons for this netbook (which I will detail later), but at that price point, I was willing to overlook it.

Now, there were a few ultraportable laptops that were better suited for playing the latest games, but they were either a few hundred dollars more than the ASUS 1215N, weighed a few more pounds, had less battery life, and/or had a smaller screen. What I really liked about the ASUS 1215N (besides the price I got it for ) was that it had a large screen compared to the other netbooks, it still weighed less than the ultraportable laptops, and has a better CPU and GPU than most of the other netbooks that are similarly priced.

Now for the Cons, starting with what scares me the most:

The horrible power plug design. There is a small pin in the power port that can easily break off and render your netbook useless due to not being able to charge it. This is a huge turn off and my heart goes out to all those people who had this happen to them and had to take advantage of the warranty, but had to deal with the bad customer service at ASUS and the ~1 month wait to get their laptop repaired and shipped back for them. Just remember, you have to pay for the shipping when sending your broken netbook back to ASUS to get it repaired. I have no idea why ASUS just didn’t fix the poor power plug design by implementing the standard power plug design that other laptops and netbooks use that don’t share this problem!

Intel put a lot of limitations on the ASUS 1215N netbook that didn’t have to be there, but they did it because they’re greedy. Intel makes higher profit margins when consumers purchase the more expensive laptops rather than the cheaper netbooks. So because of this, Intel refused to share the DMI interface with the Nvidia’s Ion 2 GPU, forcing the Ion 2 to operate on the PCI-e 1x lane. Not only that but, the 64-bit Intel Atom D525 CPU is only capable of 32-bit addressing. So forget about installing Windows 7 64-bit due to the 32-bit addressing making that pointless. Oh yeah, the RAM runs in single channel mode only. And if you do decide to buy more RAM, there are countless posts where the RAM people are buying is not compatible with the ASUS 1215N (even though it may have worked for someone else) so the netbook is extremely finicky. If you do get the netbook to boot up with the new RAM, you will only see ~2.74GB of RAM in Windows due to the limitations of 32-bit.

Others mention there is some flex in the center of the keyboard and that the mouse button on the netbook is not that great. I’m not too worried about the mouse because I purchased a Logitech Trackman Marble Mouse and also got a Logitech V220 Cordless Optical Mouse for free at the time of purchase. I also went with the larger Case Logic Slimline Case 12.1″ (10.6″ – 13.3″) to store my netbook in.

One thing I would recommend if you are going to purchase this netbook is to also purchase a Transcend 16GB Class 10 SDHC Card (TS16GSDHC10) and leave that in your netbook’s SDHC flash card slot and configure it for ReadyBoost. It’s not that expensive, one of the fastest / best SDHC Cards for that price, and you may notice a performance increase due to the memory limitations on this netbook (a few more FPS in games).

Don’t expect this netbook to have great performance in the latest games or to play these games at high settings due to the limitations I listed, but for what I will be using this netbook for and for the majority of games I play, I can see myself being very satisfied and happy with this purchase. Especially since I got it on sale.

Oh yeah, I didn’t forget about the no USB 3.0 capability, no BlueTooth, or the 0.3 megapixel cam. I’ll admit, BlueTooth would’ve been nice, but I guess I can live without that. The cheap cam doesn’t matter to me (I do like the security lens cover though) and the USB 3.0 is…

Read more

Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 

Was this review helpful to you? 

|

 Comments (11)